|
Canadian Trust Funds to be Taxed - Discussed
|
Can't Post
|
|
Uh oh, trouble in the finance sector and for the Conservatives. Finance Minister Jim Flaherty will clamp down on income trusts, saying the tax system is "not fair and is a corporate tax havens." He's setting out a transition plan over four years to tighten some of the loopholes, while at the same time reducing corporate taxes. Flaherty said Tuesday at an Ottawa news conference that if he didn't act, the trend would shift billions of dollars in tax burden off corporations and onto individuals. In 2006, there have been $70 billion worth of corporate conversions to income trusts. Those include Telus Corp. and BCE who are now clamouring to find new ways to hide their money :P Canada has about 250 income trusts work about $200 billion. They exist in real estate, oil and gas, telecom, industrial, manufacturing and food sectors. While they are a popular investment, they can be risky if business conditions deteriorate and companies cut payments in response. Flaherty's proposed rules would apply a new tax on the money distributed to shareholders by newly formed income trusts. Existing income trusts would be given a four-year transition period, ending in 2011, that would allow them to adjust to the new rules. So the bad news? The conservatives reneged on an election promise. The pros? Corporate income taxes would be cut by 2011 to remove some of the market incentives to form income trusts. Some have said Canada's tax-leakage problem has doubled in two years, from $540 million annually in 2004. Income trusts will cost Ottawa and the provinces $1.1 billion a year in lost tax dollars once Telus Corp. and BCE Inc. convert to the increasingly popular corporate structure. The tax burden is instead shifting to individuals, who would have to pay more on the higher payouts from pension plans and registered retirement savings plans. Apparently the Liberals are Ok with that and most in Ontario would rather see Liberals win elections than pay lower taxes. Ottawa will bear about two-thirds of the $1.1-billion in tax revenue losses, or $726-million; the remaining one third, or $374-million, will be shared by the provinces and territories, Mintz estimates. Analysts say the Tories fear a backlash like the one suffered by the former Liberal government when it tried to tinker with the politically-explosive file. Interim Liberal Leader Bill Graham called the move a flip-flop. "All I can remember is that during the election, Mr. Flaherty and the prime minister said under no condition would they touch income trusts," he said. On their side, analyst Sandy MacIntyre suggested these changes will hurt the little guys in the investment game. "The losers are retail investors, and unfortunately, retail investors don't have a strong lobby in Ottawa," MacIntyre said. Flaherty made the following other changes. He announced the government would: "We will permit income splitting for pensioners beginning in 2007,'' Flaherty said. "This will significantly enhance the incentives to save and invest for family retirement security.'' While retired couples can split Canada and Quebec pension payments, they can't split other incomes; for example, company pensions or retirement funds. As a result, income gets concentrated in the hands of the higher earner, leading to a greater tax bite. Flaherty put a $1.24-billion price annual tag on all the changes when they fully come into effect by 2011. The finance minister also hinted the Conservative government would be cutting personal income taxes. Join the Economics Community!
|

Barry
Mr. Do It All

Nov 2, 2006, 11:38 AM
Post #1 of 3
(756 views)
|